The High Court in Akwa Ibom state on Wednesday revoked the bail and issued an arrest warrant on Prof Ignatius Uduk, a University of Uyo (UNIUYO) don who is facing trial for alleged electoral fraud during the 2019 general elections.
The presiding judge, Justice Bassey Nkanang of Uyo High Court 5, decided in response to the application by the Plaintiff, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), to revoke the bail after a second judgement day absence by the Defendant, neither was his Counsel, George Ezeugwu present.
Read also:Heartbreak and Grief: Families Mourn Victims of Enugu Tanker Fire Tragedy
INEC, under Mike Igini as Resident Electoral Commissioner (REC) Akwa Ibom state, had opened prosecution against Uduk, a Professor of Human Kinetics who served as a Collation/Returning officer for Essien Udim State Constituency during the March 2019 elections, on a three-count amended charge of abandonment of duties, publishing/announcing of fake election result scores and lying on oath.
While another UNIUYO Professor, Peter Ogban who was also arraigned by INEC under similar circumstances, was convicted and sentenced to three years in prison, the trial of Professor Uduk suffered repeated adjournments on the part of the Defendant, resulting in a change of the presiding judge.
Justice Nkanang had stood down the case for an hour and asked a Lawyer, Ndifreke Inyangette to contact the defence counsel to ascertain the reason for his absence in court.
When the matter was called again, Inyangette standing in for the Defendant’s Counsel, informed the court that Ezeugwu sent him a message via text that he was ill. He also told the court that the Defense Counsel also told him his client was also ill.
In his ruling, Justice Nkanang, admitted being aware of the defendant’s health condition, but regardless, granted prayers of INEC’s Counsel, Onwuenwunor, revoking the bail earlier granted to the defendant and issued a bench warrant against him.
He then adjourned the case till Wednesday, February 5, 202,5 for the judgment.
Onwuenwunor, SAN, on the push for Wednesday’s application that informed the ruling explained shortly after the adjournment that, “This matter was adjourned on the day for judgement today.
“As required in criminal matters, the Accused or Defendant must be present in court. The Defendant was not in court today, his lawyer was also not in court, until after the matter was stood down and it was called back.
