Court Grants Activist Mahdi Shehu N3 Million Bail Over Alleged False Claims About French Military Base, Seizes Passport

Federal High Court in Katsina has granted bail to prominent activist Mahdi Shehu in the sum of N3 million. The bail was issued in connection to allegations surrounding his controversial claims about the existence of a French military base in the Niger Republic. The court also ordered the seizure of his international passport, restricting his movement pending the resolution of the case.

Mahdi Shehu, a well-known social commentator and activist, was arrested and arraigned following accusations of spreading false information and making unsubstantiated statements regarding foreign military presence in the region. His claims, which sparked significant public discourse, had drawn criticism from various quarters, with government authorities deeming them a potential threat to national security.

At the bail hearing, the presiding judge emphasized the importance of balancing the defendant’s rights with the need to ensure his availability for trial. In addition to the N3 million bail, Shehu is required to provide two sureties, one of whom must be a civil servant of a senior rank.

Shehu’s legal team expressed satisfaction with the court’s decision, describing it as a fair ruling that upholds the principle of presumption of innocence until proven guilty. “This is a victory for justice. Our client is prepared to defend his statements and prove his case in court,” one of his lawyers said.

The activist’s case has drawn widespread attention, with many civil society organizations and human rights advocates rallying behind him. Critics argue that his arrest could stifle freedom of speech and discourage public figures from holding authorities accountable.

Meanwhile, government representatives have reiterated their commitment to ensuring the rule of law and protecting national security. The court adjourned the case to a later date, where the substantive hearing will commence to determine the veracity of the allegations against Shehu.

This case highlights ongoing debates around freedom of expression, national security, and the role of public figures in holding governments accountable.